Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superpop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:12, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Superpop

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable bootleg/pirated album —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete even if it is Madonna. Being a bootleg is non-notable enough, but combined with a lack of reliable sources makes this article not worthy of inclusion. Even if the artist is notable, a bootleg is still a bootleg.
csdnew 03:41, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete as article fails
notability criteria for albums. It was never officialy released and bootlegs are generaly not notable. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 14:35, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can we speedy delete this crap? — Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:34, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.