Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supreme Understanding
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Supreme Understanding
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Supreme Understanding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NN author. Self-published references only.
Sabih omar 20:24, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and New Jersey. Shellwood (talk) 21:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 03:14, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: As original research, with "This style is curious, given his claims about his own higher education". A claim of being a doctor should be sourced. The subject is the owner of Supreme Design Publishing] thus allowing the promotion of the books and name.
- Delete. I don't see how this person passes not a single reliable source independent of the subject. Even if it is not autobiography, there is zero evidence this passes GNG. Bearian (talk) 20:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.