Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susanna Strati

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Susanna Strati

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was contested. Artist has exhibited in Sydney and Rome ("internationally") and been a finalist for a couple of prizes (including one run by the college she works for). I've searched for English and Italian news sources about her but can't find any. Long standing notability concerns, fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. Sionk (talk) 20:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - Artist with no evidence of notability. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 21:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete Yes, as per the CV here I don't think she meets notability, but most of the cases we have seen at AfD recently have been much more obvious, and in minding the Gender Gap I would note that in some cases men with about the same credentials have been kept.--Theredproject (talk) 03:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken. I agree editors are much more forgiving to men. However, I was slowly working through the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women artists/Notability concerns, which we set up to give additional time to find supportive evidence/sources. Being an artist from an English speaking country the evidence is much more likely to be available, if it exists. If I saw one single thing that indicated notability I would not have nominated her. Sionk (talk) 13:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete suspected WP:AUTOBIO created by a single purpose editor. LibStar (talk) 04:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. The cv lists a solo show at a notable gallery, Object: Australian Design Centre. If there were more like that, it might be enough. But the other shows and awards listed look too minor for me. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete -- thanks to the nom for doing such research and for everyone for trying to avoid the Gender Gap; it's pretty close, but if the British School residency is still the highest award (it's important, but below the limit for WP:PROF/Artist, in my opinion; a bit like a Yaddo or MacDowell residency; hints at notability but needs more) then it's a bit low. Would reconsider if more awards/exhibitions can be found. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 20:12, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.