Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swimming pool cover

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Swimming pool#Covers. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:56, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Swimming pool cover (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. The only sources that came up on Google were pool cover company websites and advert-laden listicles. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 01:07, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Subject doesn't meet the GNG, and
  WP:NOTDICTIONARY also seems to apply here. User:Let'srun 01:47, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to
  alternative to deletion here. Apparently this was split from a longer version of that section, but perhaps given the thin sourcing, the subsequent shrinking of the section was, by itself, the actual correct solution to the size/length problem, not a separate article. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  I like the idea of redirecting the article. Cwater1 (talk) 02:38, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I would not be opposed to that either. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 18:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Swimming_pool#Covers. Mooonswimmer 13:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]