Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swingers (2007 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Swingers (2007 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced article about a film, which literally just states that it exists, the end, and doesn't even attempt a notability claim that would pass

WP:GNG. But even on a search for better sources, literally the only thing I can find anywhere is this, which namechecks the film's existence a single time in the process of calling the filmmaker's overall body of work little-seen, poorly funded and poorly distributed. That's just not enough. Bearcat (talk) 13:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete Fails
WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 15:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: Wow... if it's too much for people to add any real content in here after 10 years... it's too much for a full BEFORE beyond a few minutes... I did a few clicks around the search tools, but nothing relevant. Fails GNG and NFILM. -- 2pou (talk) 14:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.