Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Anwer Aleemi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Anwer Aleemi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article provides no reliable sources on the subject, and I am unable to find any through Google Books, News, or Scholar, despite the claims the article makes for his importance. It's possible there's another, more common spelling of his name, but I can't find it, nor can I turn up any references to his organization "Human Rights International" (there's an Italian NGO by this name, but he doesn't seem to be a part of it), or his book of poems "Flames of Thoughts". (I don't speak Urdu, though, so my searches were limited to English-only.) So I thought I'd put this article up for AfD trial by fire; I'd be happy if somebody can turn up some sources and fill this one out, but I wasn't able to do it myself. Khazar2 (talk) 19:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a Delete for me - don't really see the coverage you'd expect to see for the chair of an international human rights think tank, or renowned poet. No significant independent coverage, not notable ---- _nonsense ferret 01:32, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. Zia Khan 17:42, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.