Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TRAC (ISMS)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar

⨹ 02:36, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

TRAC (ISMS)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is blatant advertising, created and heavily edited by two users, User:SecureBanking and User:Tvanpeursem, both of whom seem to be associated with the company that created the product (the subject of the article). The tone of the article is clearly promotional, so the intent of the article is clear. V2Blast (talk) 08:23, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 08:40, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 08:40, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in independent sources. The one conference paper appears to be authored by people associated with the software developers, and inclusion as a partner for a banking association is not significant coverage. A search did not turn up any significant RS coverage. A post-deletion redirect to the developer, Secure Banking Solutions, would also be reasonable, if that page survives its current Afd.Dialectric (talk) 11:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 01:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Searches are complicated by "TRAC" being a common product name in diverse areas, but I am seeing nothing to indicate that this security/risk management product is of
encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 12:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.