Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TV Noise (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:56, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TV Noise

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:MUSICBIO. Little coverage in reliable secondary sources. Magnolia677 (talk) 02:38, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment: It looks like that I could use help with improving this article and making it more notable, because it still could not pass
WP:MUSICBIO. Could you guys help out please? Thank you.@Alsee:@Ss112:@Earflaps:@Infopage100:@Jax 0677: - XPanettaa (talk) 13:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Consensus has twice before been reached that TV Noise does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. I'm not sure how more editors searching for reliable sources that don't exist will increase this band's notability. Winning a Grammy or having a few songs chart would certainly help. Until then, this is kind of like flogging a dead horse. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

XPanettaa, it would be more useful if you screened topis for notability before posting a page. It saves a lot of time for everyone involved. Earflaps (talk) 17:30, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: - This page is really notable. TV Noise is really notable. They collaborated with Martin Garrix and other big DJs. It takes time to make pages perfect. So us Wikipedians will get around this page really soon. But for now, just keep this page. P.s., this has got to be the poorest written comment by me.

Infopage100 (talk) 16:53, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: - Hey @XPanettaa:, I haven't done much for TV Noise yet, but I did update the writing under the career table quite a bit. I will gather a bunch of references for this article soon. It's just been taking a little while because I've been mainly focusing on Mike Hawkins (musician). I think you asked me to edit that page earlier, and I certainly did. Though I'm not finished with that project either unfortunately. I'm not even halfway finished with anything yet. So check out Hawkins and TV Noise to see the progress, and let me know what you think on this talk page or on my own, User talk:Infopage100. Anyways, I wish you good luck with your articles, and I'm utterly exhausted, so goodnight.

Infopage100 (talk) 07:14, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Hello @
TV Noise
, and have no more information to contribute to this page. Therefore this means that I will no longer be editing the following page. Tomorrow I will be busy updating an article that a friend of mine requested my help for, as I have already promised to do so days prior. If you wish to help you may. Thank you and good luck with the page.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:07, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:07, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No real claim to notability. Add that to the over the top promotion, the over the top excessive refspamming, the undue weight given to almost everything, the fan cruft, the lack of any real coverage
WP:GNG. Delete. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - cannot find one article about their songs which is not clearly a routine song announcement / press release. They seem to have done one minor interview in a non-notable magazine (Empty Lighthouse) but otherwise there is no coverage - no reviews, no charts. Simply, not notable. Nik thestunned 12:15, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Hello fellow Wikipedians:

@Alsee:, @Ss112:, @Infopage100:, @TheMagnificentist:, @Earflaps:, @Jax 0677:, and anybody else, I need your help, because this article is still not notable enough. Could you guys help out please? This has to be notable, just like Mike Hawkins (musician) which has been expanded by Infopage100 before and after Jo-Jo Eumerus closes the deletion discussion. XPanettaa (talk) 15:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply@

Gryffin (DJ) and Ookay. If they were done because of me not responding to your ping on 19th October then I am sorry because I did not see this until now or I might have been distracted. Please do not take it personally, I hope we can remain good Wikipedians without personally attempting to sabotage each other's edits. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 07:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:VOTESTACKING @Drmies:? Karst (talk) 12:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Well, maybe, sure, a bit. XP is asking for help on the article, though we can guess what it means. I assume that the readers who were pinged will have found out by now that XPanettaa is indef-blocked. Drmies (talk) 15:57, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - @
be bold! --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Reply - @XPanettaa:, ummm.... I'll try to do something. I really don't know what else I can do. Sorry. Infopage100 (talk) 04:22, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no indication that the duo meet the criteria under
WP:PRIMARY. Karst (talk) 12:51, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.