Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tabeer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. v/r - TP 03:39, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tabeer

Tabeer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A debut album that didn't chart, minor label and is ref'ed with blogs and forums. Dennis Brown (talk) 19:44, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep :Album did fairly good,though not topped the chart,especially in
  talk) 18:32, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  It isn't required that they topped any chart, but I don't see evidence of it charting in any position, even at the bottom. Charting isn't the criteria but it would have demonstrated notability without much else. Claiming it did well in one country would require a citation of some type. I would also argue that much of the new sources fall very short of passing

  WP:RS, although not all. Dennis Brown (talk) 17:42, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

  ]

Relisted

to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted

to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CharlieEchoTango (contact) 04:33, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted

to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:56, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep A simple google news search gives
  User:Prav001 has already added the Outlook source, plus cites to The Hindu and the Financial Express. 86.44.31.213 (talk) 18:26, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - Held over three times, no votes for deletion other than the nominator. There is very little stomach for blowing up pop-culture esoterica at WP, and that's fine. Carrite (talk) 04:00, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I'd delete for lack of notability, but I appreciate there is never going to be a consensus for that, so I am stuck listening to the sound of my own voice. --Legis (talk - contribs) 07:54, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]