Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taken in hand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:05, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taken in hand

No indication that this BDSM term is used beyond the site that is promoting it. WP:ADVERT in my view; prod removed. VG ☎ 00:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Taken in Hand is not a BDSM term. It is a style of relationship separate from the BDSM subculture. However, I agree that the term is not notable enough to include in an encyclopedia. Shreditor (talk) 02:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- VG ☎ 00:57, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 19:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I actually don't know if it's a BDSM term, I just think that doesn't matter very much. More important is that most of the content of this page comes from the webpage takeninhand.com. So there is pretty little relevance of that subject outside of takeninhand.com. Gamgee (talk) 22:15, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in agreement with the case made above. Drmies (talk) 01:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Bonfire of vanities (talk) 01:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong, speedy delete - Per
WP:NOT, it says it is a neologism, so why hasn't it been deleted already? Should've been PRODded because of the irony in the page. - ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 11:44, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.