Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talia Mar (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Talia Mar

Talia Mar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

sourced almost entirely to blackhat SEO, non rs, blatantly unreliable spammy nonsense and social media. Despite the claims, she woefully fails

• Comment I think the charted single makes her notable, but the there is too much puffery in sources to find much to support notability, discussing who she's dating or dissing at this moment. Oaktree b (talk) 14:33, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 14:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes
  WP:MUSICBIO#C2. I've taken out some of the worst puffery/unsourced stuff, but it needs a proper copyedit.--Launchballer 14:48, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep The page was originally a bit filled but was correctly sourced, since then the page has been cut down by other users who have made it "less unreliable and spammy" which makes the page now more notable and with correct reliable sources. Like mentioned it passes
  WP:MUSICBIO#C2 (in two national charts) which makes it notable and it adds to the site as she is an upcoming artist (this is being proven by her "stay the night" song reaching charts and doing well commercially), she is a big name amongst fans of the UK YouTube scene due to her involvement with the sidemen, KSI and that group which again makes her more than notable. RedactedUser300 (talk) 17:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Weak keep. Although this satisfies the SNG (
  WP:MUSICBIO#C2), as stated above, significant coverage for GNG is still pretty sparse and I didn't find any other independent reliable sources not already included. ComplexRational (talk) 22:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Passes
  WP:MUSICBIO because of charting tracks. Zeddedm (talk) 20:58, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.