Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk Media News

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:17, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Media News

Talk Media News (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in

WP:NORG. I find lots of stuff by them but nothing about them. Most of the claims of significance are now marked as failing verification. This is a strategy often used by undisclosed paid promotional editors to get their articles to 'stick'. Jbh Talk 01:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 03:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 03:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Note. Per the HighBeam search there are numerous references to the company providing sole radio coverage of the US President roughly every 10 days, which is consistent with the size of the radio contingent of the White House press corps. By its very nature, however, pool coverage is circulated internally among outlets covering the president and audio and notes gathered by the pool are often used by newsrooms without attribution. In the White House briefing room, the company now occupies the back-row left seat of Talk Radio News Service, which no longer operates a website. Both firms were founded by Ellen Ratner and appear to have similar business models. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mercuryblued (talkcontribs) 22:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No in depth coverage in independent sources. 331dot (talk) 16:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.