Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamara Siuda
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 13:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Tamara Siuda
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Tamara Siuda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article fails to establish the notability of it's subject, as almost all of the sources are primary ones. Furthermore, the article has had this problem, among others, since 2012. Anything useful here could be moved to the article on Kemetic Orthodoxy. ―Susmuffin Talk 02:03, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the talk) 03:40, 4 January 2019 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the talk) 03:40, 4 January 2019 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the talk) 03:40, 4 January 2019 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the talk) 03:40, 4 January 2019 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:08, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete fails ]
- delete No significant independent coverage to meet the GNG and no indication of being notable as an author, scholar, or religious leader. Sandals1 (talk) 18:27, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per above no independent coverage to meet WP:GNG Reddragon7 (talk) 11:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.