Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tane Ikai (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to List of Japanese supercentenarians. Curiously enough, I am closing the AfD again. However, this time it seems that the consensus is clear. Tone 17:14, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Tane Ikai
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No independent notability besides her exceptional longevity. This person's entry in the
WP:NOPAGE. I performed a redirect on 8 November but it was reverted on 9 November, thus I'm seeking consensus to re-instate the redirect. Many similar articles about non-notable people who lived over 110 years were recently merged or deleted. — JFG talk 04:00, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
]
- Delete a non-notable oldster.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. A bunch of random stats about managing to ward off the reaper for an unusually long time is not evidence of notability. As per usual, ]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ]
- Delete This article fails ]
- Keep. She was in the top 5 oldest verified people ever at the time of her death and she held the title of "oldest verified Japanese person ever" for about 20 years before she was finally surpassed. She is certainly notable. RightGot (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- This is not a tournament to see who can maintain a pulse the longest. Where are the sources besides the thoroughly routine coverage already present? The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)]
- This is not a tournament to see who can maintain a pulse the longest. Where are the sources besides the thoroughly
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.