Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Hyde

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 01:10, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tanya Hyde

Tanya Hyde (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails ENT and GNG.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:40, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:40, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:40, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:40, 21 June 2019 (UTC) [reply]

• Keep Subject received AVN award, which according to this source "have more in common with Oscars than you might think". Seems to pass
  WP:ANYBIO for receiving a potentially significant (though entertainement is not my area of interest so cannot comment on that) award.Delete per Gene93k. Edit: Comments below seem to put in doubt status of award, previous corrected and !vote amended 107.190.33.254 (talk), 01:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC); edited 02:29, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• The comparisons in the article are superficial. A fundamental difference is that Oscar nominations and wins are much more likely to receive non-trivial attention from reputable independent media. The consensus in dropping WP:PORNBIO is that winning a porn award without interest from good sources is not significant for satisfying WP:ANYBIO or
  WP:ENT. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete. The subject fails
  WP:FILMMAKER as a director. Niche porn award wins without any support from good secondary sources do not establish notability. An independent search for RS coverage yielded only false positive matches for people with the same name. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Fail
  talk) 18:12, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per Gene93k's sound analysis. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 16:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.