Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatsuhiko Yoshino

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  06:38, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tatsuhiko Yoshino

Tatsuhiko Yoshino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet

WP:ENTERTAINER. No significant coverage in reliable independent sources. All sources primary or from wrestling database with no criteria for inclusion. Nikki311 01:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki311 01:17, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Nikki311 01:17, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:12, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Article has poor references, but <ref>http://puroresuspirit.net/guts-world/tatsuhiko-yoshino/</ref><ref>http://www.voicesofwrestling.com/2016/10/27/tatsuhiko-yoshino-small-things/</ref><ref>https://dramaticddt.wordpress.com/tag/tatsuhiko-yoshino/</ref> exist, as I'm sure some stuff on F4WOnline. Lee Vilenski(talk) 14:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please see
WP:PW/RS. Puroresuspirit.net and voicesofwrestling.com are not reliable sources. DramaticDDT is primary. They do not establish notability. Nikki311 16:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:31, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no one has yet identified any reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Have you tried? We don't delete based on what other people haven't tried to find. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:01, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.