Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taulia Tagovailoa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tua Tagovailoa#Personal Life per ATD and CHEAP. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:57, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Taulia Tagovailoa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per

WP:NCOLLATH, and the statement in the article that as the backup quarterback he "sees little playing time". Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 23:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete Seems to only gain coverage in relation to his brother, and notability is not inherited. Hog Farm (talk) 01:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:17, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete my before search only brought up coverage of his family member - it's possible there was some of him in there but nothing at all jumps out.
WP:TOOSOON no prejudice on recreation. SportingFlyer T·C 11:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Although
WP:NOTINHERITED is an integral part of this encyclopedia subject of article clearly passes general notability guidelines as he has been covered in reliable media which discusses him solely apart from his brother. Celestina007 (talk) 22:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

userfy subject hasn't met notability yet, which is not uncommon for backup QBs even at Div I. I believe it is only a matter of time--which of course, means notability has not been met yet and the article should be deleted... but then when he does pass the notability threshold (almost a guarantee) we re-create the article... so let's just userfy for now. I'm confident there's an enthusiastic editor that can store the article in their user pages until that day comes. I think that's the best solution.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:14, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Paulmcdonald: Are you volunteering? —Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If no one else will, sure... but I'm not all that enthusiastic about it. I'd go with whoever was enthusiastic enough to create the article in the first place.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Tua Tagovailoa#Personal Life, since he is discussed there and that would preserve the history for use if and when he meets our notability guidelines. Rlendog (talk) 20:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy with a redirect. SportingFlyer T·C 12:23, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify / Userfy (prefer Draft: namespace) or Delete (1) per
WP:RS coverage than I have), I feel a redirect would be confusing to the reader in this case due to the similar names; they may wonder if this is the longer name or a pseudonym for his brother. Doug Mehus T·C 23:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

@Dmehus: If the article gets moved to AfC, I would have to accept it if it were to pass an AfD - I've never seen an AfD article "sent to AfC" but rather would suggest draftify "sit in draft space until X event happens." He's not likely to become notable in the next six months in my estimation - unless he becomes the starter. He only gets coverage because of his brother, so if we redirect to his brother, people will not only find what they're looking for when they search for him, but all we have to do is restore the old version if/when he becomes notable. SportingFlyer T·C 10:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
SportingFlyer, True, but I think a redirect would be more confusing in this case because the names are similar looking, it would lead to reader confusion. I'll say "delete" as my second choice. Doug Mehus T·C 13:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 10:07, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Rlendog. Notability is not inherited, but the subject is only a freshman and may become more notable in the future. Redirects are cheap and will enable us to preserve the page history for later.
Lepricavark (talk) 05:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.