Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Rhodes Scholars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Mr.Z-man 04:33, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Team Rhodes Scholars

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:Notability (people/entertainer) and WP:Notability (sports). No independent coverage explaining how this is significant or how this less-than-one-year wrestling team has contributed in a substantial or 'unique, prolific or innovative' manner. Moreover, content is already on both Rhodes and Sandow articles. Qwerty Binary (talk) 04:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per OP. Existing isn't enough to warrant an article, and this tag team did nothing of note. —
BB 20:19, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Notability problems haven't gotten any better since it was tagged in March. Also doesn't help that the tag team was relatively short lived never did anything worth writing home about.LM2000 (talk) 23:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I guess the pair two mid-carders together technique, did not work this time around for WWE. A very short lived team that did nothing significant. STATic message me! 02:02, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.