Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teaparty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 22:47, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Teaparty

Teaparty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log

)

This looks to be a non-notable neologism. Irbisgreif (talk) 23:17, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - perhaps an
  A7?  Frank  |  talk  23:26, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Comment - Not quite. If you feel it is, tag it. I'm trying to be more cautious as I get complaints from time to time about my use of speedy-delete tags. Irbisgreif (talk) 23:28, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Sorry, I've declined to speedily delete this. A7 doesn't cover neologisms. Mikaey, Devil's advocate 07:42, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete
  dicdef. Wikipedia is not UrbanDictionary. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 02:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Agree Power.corrupts (talk) 12:03, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.