Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teenage Lesbian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 15:35, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teenage Lesbian

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From my original PROD: "Non-notable pornographic film. Just another adult film." There is nothing I could find that can verify that this film is notable in its own right as being exceptional as opposed to the minimal amount of articles of actual notable pornographic films. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:11, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:23, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete AVN awards are no longer notable on here (I think), so the film has no other coverage. WAY TOO MANY hits when you google this particular word combo; even when adding "film" you still get more than enough to sort through. I don't see any non-adult mentions of the film. Oaktree b (talk) 18:14, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:54, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:55, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The film is notable as it received recognition for cinematic excellence at the Queen Palm International Film Festival, wherein it also received silver award for the Best Feature – Love is Love (https://thehollywoodtimes.today/adult-times-teenage-lesbian-silver-winner-at-queen-palm-international-film-festival/) Rim sim (talk) 09:44, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable award from a non notable festival covered in a source of no clear importance in a way that looks like advertising. Dronebogus (talk) 10:18, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per my above comment, no real reason to think whatever the “QPIFF Recognition for Cinematic Excellence award” is helps pass notability standards Dronebogus (talk) 10:20, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not seeing or finding secondary source coverage supporting any claim of general or
WP:NFILM notability. Thehollywoodtimes.today article is an obvious press release on a site that invites user-submitted stories. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. I join those who doubt that the QPIFF award contributes any notability, and the only sources I could find mentioning it are press releases, including the Hollywood Times source linked above. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:22, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.