Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telfaz11

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 03:37, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Telfaz11

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason: Because the page did not meet speedy deletion but, to me, the group is not notable, or even tell why it's notable. Ike1x (talk) 15:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (
Talk to my owner:Online 15:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. The article is cited entirely to Youtube, Wikipedia itself, and this article. That one legitimate source would certainly contribute toward notability claims for Fahad Albutairi (notable, but whose article could use some cleanup). But that source doesn't even mention Telfaz11, nor does anything else I can find as a reliable, independent source. In part that's because Telfaz11 isn't even the production company—that's C3 Films, which probably isn't independently notable, either—but rather the branding it has given its various online programs. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:15, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 21:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 21:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 21:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:35, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 06:49, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.