Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That's Amore! (TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star Mississippi 00:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's Amore! (TV series)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:UNDUE. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:38, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:38, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: [1], [2], [3] (comes from an AP article, which presumably has a direct link somewhere), [4].
matt91486 (talk) 05:34, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Sourcing appears to be just about enough to meet guidelines.
talk) 08:46, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:54, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - coverage is there to pass GNG, aired full season on major cable network. WikiVirusC^(talk) 12:34, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on sources listed above, at the very least it passes
WP:GNG. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.