Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That's So Hollywood
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
That's So Hollywood
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- That's So Hollywood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Single-affiliate show. Couldn't find any sources beyond what's already here Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:15, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:15, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:07, 6 June 2022 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:09, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting one last time to see if another editor will participate.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, I could not find any secondary sources covering this show, meaning it fails WP:GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 04:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.