Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 4th Chapter
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Jared_Evan#EPs. title presents a useful redirect (non-admin closure) Odie5533 (talk) 07:42, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The 4th Chapter
Looks like this hasn't garnered enough (any) independant reliable sourcing for a standalone article. The sources provided in the article are user generated content and very sketchy and google news doen't mention this at all which suggests there is not significant coverage in the media/press. All in all, looks non notable and should be deleted.
]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ]
- Redirect to Jared_Evan#EPs - The best source the article currently provides would probably be The Source. Google News found two Greek links here and here as well as one English link here. The article claims vibe.com praised the EP but this is false because it never actually talks about the album aside from "Pretty interesting concept". SwisterTwister talk 02:06, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Huntley 00:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - per ST. TheSpecialUser TSU 03:42, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.