Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bollywood Boyz

The Bollywood Boyz

The Bollywood Boyz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable wrestlers. GNG coverage is limited. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 20:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep - meets
  WP:GNG. Three articles in SLAM! Wrestling [1], [2], and [3]. Global News [4]. Burnaby Now [5]. CBC News [6]. Articles range from 2008 to present. Nikki♥311 23:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep they are active members of WWE's main roster. No idea why you nominated this. 86.3.174.49 (talk) 05:53, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep has significant coverage, are part of the main roster of the biggest professional wrestling promotion in the world.  MPJ-DK  11:49, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per all above. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:07, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. While neither person warrants an article individually, they are notable enough as a duo. Str1977 ^(talk) 17:27, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as they are notable as duo (not individually). Nickag989^talk 17:58, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Have received constant coverage over an extended period of time. Meets
  WP:SIGCOV.LM2000 (talk) 20:38, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Current WWE main roster members appearing as duo 15:42, 5 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.163.254.156 (talk)
• Keep They are members of the biggest wrestling promotion in the world. You tried to do this same thing with the 2016 and 2017 drafts and now this, maybe you should stop requesting deletions for articles because you obviously don't know what's important or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwefan5x (talk • contribs) 20:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please be
    civil. Not everyone is going to agree with every nomination. State your case why an article should be kept or deleted, and leave it at that. Nikki♥311 03:46, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Keep There may be more notable sources to come and more coverage over time. Hansen Sebastian 15:22, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
• Obvious keep: If we get too many of these obvious keep nominations from Sportsfan 1234 we may want to go to
  WP:ANI and ask for a topic ban against him nominating wrestling-related pages for deletion. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.