Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The East Bay Sessions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 14:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The East Bay Sessions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable demo album/bootleg —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:36, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. This was produced and distributed by a company, not by fans or as a simple recording of a show. - Azechiel (talk) 08:38, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - first of all, the nominator lumped two different categories together, demo and bootleg, which are not the same and raise their own unique issues. Even so, this album is neither of those. Instead it's an unauthorized album and that does not automatically mean non-notability in itself. No vote from me at this time, but let's get a discussion going on the correct footing, and avoid fallacies like

WP:JUSTAPOLICY. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:14, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Basically, what he said above. It is not a fan made bootleg. It was an unauthorized release by a company. I disagree. --blm07 であります！ 18:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 02:43, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete - It's really not important whether it's a demo or an official release, as
notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." I am unable to find significant coverage of this album and the article does not provide any reliable independent sources. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:10, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.