Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fame: Monster
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to The Fame#The Fame Monster. Tone 16:36, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
The Fame: Monster
 | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspectedcsp |username}}. |
Delete, redirect and WP:NALBUMS. All relevent infomation is already mention in the existing article, so why need for a new one? SALT due to frequent fanboy re-creation. Dale 14:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)]
- Redirect to The Fame#The Fame Monster, then lock the redirect to avoid recreation. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 15:22, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- Merge & Redirect to The Fame. It is just a re-release and they shouldn't have their own articles. --PlatinumFire 16:20, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect and lock per nomination. talk|contr.) 17:18, 10 October 2009 (UTC)]
- Delete and redirect to The Fame. It's a RE-RELEASE!Zefron12 (talk) 18:28, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect to The Fame#The Fame: Monster and lock. talkingbirds 18:32, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect. Other album re-releases don't have their own page, so this is no exception. ---Shadow (talk) 06:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect it's just a re-release --♫Smanu! 08:50, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 21:50, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect and full-protect Re-releases and special editions do not receive articles. Given the chronic recreations, protection is necessary to prevent immediate undoing.—Kww(talk) 01:48, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect and Full-protect per Kww and Dale. --Legolas (talk2me) 05:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, redirect to section If this is simply a reissue of the existing album (enhanced or otherwise), then it should be a section within the main article. While some exceptional cases may warrant their own articles (e.g. Pet Sounds Sessions), this does not. The redirect will prove useful for searches and anyone who tries to recreate this material as well. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:00, 14 October 2009 (UTC)]
- Redirect per above.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:06, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect and lock per nomination.--XL XR2 (talk) 21:59, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: We won't know how much it is a duplicate of the Fame until it comes out. We should have waited until the release to create this article and have this debate. Until then, Weak Keep Purplebackpack89 (talk) 18:42, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- We do know already. 17 old songs, 8 new. talk|contr.) 14:18, 17 October 2009 (UTC)]
- We do know already. 17 old songs, 8 new.
- Redirect THIS IS A RE-RELEASE, NOT A SOPHOMORE ALBUM! JUST AN EXTENSION OF THE FIRST EFFORT! MERGE AND LOCK!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.150.26.250 (talk) 22:18, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.