Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Funkadactyls
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to ]
The Funkadactyls
The team has only been on TV for almost a year and has happened to do nothing of note. They have had no notable match or feud and 90% of the time they are not even wrestlers, they're cheerleaders/valets. Fails
message me! 17:13, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Procedural comment from administrator: Please don't make an argument about how long this team has been around, feuds or the merits of being a cheerleader, etc. as they are irrelevant. Such comments will be dismissed when this AFD is closed. Remember this AFD is about
) 11:20, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per STAic. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:45, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep They have been a tag team for more than a year on T.V. not to mention their time in FCW. They are currently in a feud with Wrestlemania debut, the companys biggest ppv of the year, tonight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ8946 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect Despite being a tag team for more than a year until they are notable the page should be redirect until the team become notable like The Beautiful People otherwise ask for a protection lock so that Admins or Rollback can only edit the page. --Miss X-Factor (talk) 19:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:59, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- If the page is keep, Its going to need a lot of editing to with sources and fixing problems. --Miss X-Factor (talk) 19:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Is Diva-Dirt a reliable source? --DJ8946 (talk • contribs)DJ8946 (talk) 21:23, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete [and replace with redirect]- A speedy delete at that. The conversation at Talk:The Funkadactyls was just silly. There was no reason to revert the redirect. Feedback ☎ 07:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I don't see much of a notability problem. They've been around for a year, and are currently in a feud which has been going on for about a month. Being a cheerleader/valet doesn't automatically make you NN anyway especially when it's done for this long.talk) 07:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yesterday, the match in WM was canelled. I think that this change everything, because it was the main point, his appearance in a major event. As a team, they have a year as second characters, supporting Brodus Clay. I think that the Notability is for Brodus Clay, no for supporting characters. I think that redirect is the best option. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I don't think that their WM match is relevant to the conversation anymore with talk) 18:15, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I don't think that their WM match is relevant to the conversation anymore with
I know they scrapped it. Live streamed. But anyways yes you may redirect because I don't want it to be deleted, but I ask that whenever they do something notable that I may add it onto the page, & then it can be redirect again.DJ8946 (talk)DJ8946 (talk) 23:51, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Even when not an official name, other team names can just be added to the other names list on the infobox's bio, as if they were aliases. Hansen Sebastian 10:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: How is that a rational for a keep vote? The nomination has nothing to do with their name. It is about if the team is notable per message me! 20:17, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: How is that a rational for a keep vote? The nomination has nothing to do with their name. It is about if the team is notable per
- Delete outside of the occasional match all that they are know for is cheering on Brodius Clay.--174.93.164.125 (talk) 03:01, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.