Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hudson Reporter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator.

(non-admin closure) Galobtter (talk) 18:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

The Hudson Reporter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NCORP. References are either itself or passing mentions. Google searches don't reveal anything more than passing mentions. Galobtter (talk) 16:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Withdrawn by nominator Yeah I see that it is notable as a newspaper. Galobtter (talk) 18:19, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Galobtter (talk) 16:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. If there is anything man-made that is "inherently notable", newspapers would come the closest. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per
WP:NMEDIA#Newspapers, magazines and journals nos. 1, 2, 5. Instead of deleting this article, merging of the chain's constituents into it might be considered. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep as above Djflem (talk) 01:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.