Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hugh Mungus Incident

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doesn't seem like a likely search term to bother with a redirect. Sam Walton (talk) 11:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Hugh Mungus Incident

The Hugh Mungus Incident (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk • mail) 02:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Maybe Redirect to Rudy Pantoja? this person has received quite a bit of coverage.JohnTombs48 (talk) 06:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Might be a solution, but that, in turn, redirects to gag name. The incident is mentioned, though. Kleuske (talk) 13:21, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Or redirect to "Trigger feminist" or "Cult of outrage" - but they don't exist either ...yet. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 15:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 19:12, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 19:12, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

• Redirect to gag name, as suggested by JohnTombs48. Merge the content to that article in summary form (a couple of sentences). This incident gained a lot of attention on the web, but it fails Wikipedia:Notability (events) guidelines. utcursch | talk 20:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. trivial meme; and NOT NEWS. Not importantenough even to be used as an element in Gag name. DGG ( talk ) 05:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- barely literate prose & minor incident. Wikipedia is not a tabloid. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:19, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete (or redirect to gag name). All sources are directly-involved drama manufacturers. It's like Youtube comments are leaking... 157.235.66.80 (talk) 17:51, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - A manufactroversy that will have no lasting importance. -- Millionsandbillions (talk) 20:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or Redirect - It does seem like a big enough meme to have a Wikipedia Page and the women who filmed it is a minor public figure having appeared on
  Democracy Now and been a conference speaker and is a regional regional community organizer (please note in this last link there are multiple photos of her leading fairly sizable protests over different causes). But if it is decided to delete this article; instead of redirecting it to Gag name I would suggest merging it to the section Rudy "Hugh Mungus" Pantoja in h3h3Productions which deals with the incident.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrbusta (talk • contribs
  )
• Keep - This is an incident that has had millions of people following it. It is noteworthy.--Franz Brod (talk) 13:45, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect - Redirect to Rudy "Hugh Mungus" Pantoja in h3h3Productions per Mrbusta— Preceding unsigned comment added by Viewmont Viking (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.