Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kimber Bombs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:54, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Kimber Bombs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Team doesn't meet

WP:ROUTINE. Nikki♥311 21:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 21:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 21:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has significant coverage — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.66.24 (talk) 08:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Once again, can you provide examples? If you claim a subject has coverage, you have to back up that claim or your vote will be disregarded. Nikki♥311 15:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:07, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the coverage on
talk) 07:46, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete the team does not have the coverage required for notability, and notability is not inherited fromnotable players. I agree with
Power~enwiki that the existing coverage directly of the notable players is fine. --Bejnar (talk) 00:31, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.