Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The King of AZ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:02, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The King of AZ

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Album from artist that only has released on his own private label. None of the featured artists on the album seem to be notable. Gigs (talk) 13:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of sufficient notability. Rklawton (talk) 14:09, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per
WP:NALBUMS. But I really think this AfD should be combined with this one. Is it too late to do that? Erpert (let's talk about it) 19:36, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
- It's OK with me if you want to do that. I nominated them separately in case the artist turned out to be notable and the album wasn't, or vice versa. Gigs (talk) 19:42, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done. I also updated all the wikilinks. This thread should be speedily closed then. Erpert (let's talk about it) 21:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.