Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The King of Pirates

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to

(non-admin closure) Viztor (talk) 00:44, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The King of Pirates

The King of Pirates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I recommend MERGE into

talk) 21:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Further explanation: I recommend MERGE this article into the

Henry Avery
article.

  1. The first sentence in this article ("The King of Pirates is a fictional adventure by Daniel Defoe") contradicts the Daniel Defoe article under the heading "Some contested works attributed to Defoe" which notes "The King of Pirates - purporting to be an account of the pirate Henry Avery."
  2. "Obscure fictional book" contradicts your idea of "notable",
    WP:OVERCITE
    .
  3. "... thought to be an autobiography of Henry Avery ..." — If it's an autobiography, then it wasn't written by Daniel Defoe.
  4. "... thought to be a ... biography of Henry Avery many historians view the book as an embellished and highly romanized version of his life." — Tells me that even the historians can't agree on (a) who wrote it, and (b) who it is about.
  5. The book is already mentioned on the
    Henry Avery
    article. The book itself isn't notable if it's "obscure".

I recommend MERGE this article into the

talk) 22:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Viztor (talk) 02:36, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.