Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Maccabeats
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) mauchoeagle (c) 00:50, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Maccabeats
- The Maccabeats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet
]- Keep The group's popularity and notability has continued past the release of Candlelight. In fact, a quick Google News search shows they recently played at The White House [1], their music video director received a profile in The Jewish Week [2], and they are regularly playing at Jewish venues across the northeast. Plot Spoiler (talk) 01:19, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I was unaware of the White House performance when I nominated it for deletion (it wasn't yet in the article and it happened only the day before). It makes the nomination a closer call, although I still believe that at this point they are more of a phenomenon than anything else. Whether later they more clearly establish notability remains to be seen.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:28, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As per this new information, let's get this over with quickly -- ]
- Keep I tend to be more of a keeper than a deleter, and I'd give this one the benefit of the doubt.--Frankie Rae (talk) 20:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 22:19, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 22:19, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per nom. Their notability is based principally on a single song that became popular on YouTube. This appearance was then covered in cited WP:RS, just as we ask. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:03, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Given the level of RS coverage, it meets GNG.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:57, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.