Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mall at Westlake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 17:04, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Mall at Westlake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per

WP:GNG not notable enough to warrant an article. Gaba ^(talk) 03:10, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

talk) 02:19, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep Coverage found here, here, here. The mall was dead over 20 years ago, so other coverage may be scant. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 10:04, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I said on the article's talk page, the mall, if redeveloped as is being proposed, could be a vital part of the city of Bessemer's rejuvenation. Taylor2646 (talk) 18:44, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 18:21, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails
WP:MALL suggested a notability threshold of 800,000 square feet, more than twice the size that this mall was. The Whispering Wind (talk) 01:37, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep per TPH. There is sufficient coverage out there, I added one additional ref solely about the mall.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 03:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.