Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Runnymede Yellow Jumper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Runnymede Yellow Jumper

The Runnymede Yellow Jumper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I do not think that this jumper meets the

• Delete - absolutely non-notable. JohnCD (talk) 22:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - unless there's a planned category for roadside detritus
  hablo. 22:49, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete unverifiable. —Snigbrook 22:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It wasn't there when I looked earlier today. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:27, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you pull over?

hablo. 12:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I tried to, but I felt the traffic queue might unravel. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 15:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per DavidWBrooks. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - obviously, but kudos to the nominator for bothering to look in Google news and even Google books for sources on an obvious joke article about a random piece of dirty clothing someone saw at the side of the road :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unverifiable. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• In view of the recent UK weather, might we snowball this? Fiddle Faddle (talk) 12:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Non-notable jumper. (christ, did I just say that?) —
  neuro^(talk) 08:36, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Comment I may have to change my mind if this is a religious relic to do with Christ! All such relics must be preserved and venerated. Your comment has obviously been inspired by a higher power. Or perhaps this is the start of the
    Eschaton! -- Fiddle Faddle (talk) 11:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Keep - I wondered where I left it. Will pick up tomorrow. - Ddawkins73 (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.