Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Screen Savers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 11:57, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Screen Savers

The Screen Savers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article tagged with issue for over 2 years. No third-party sources to show notability, delete.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Neglected non-notable article. — Wyliepedia 21:12, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Didn't this used to be pretty popular? I never watched it, but I've heard of it. I found a few mentions, some of them admittedly a bit trivial: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. I'm pretty sure there's more coverage out there, but I'm tired to trying to refine my searches to avoid all the spam, blogs, and irrelevant hits. Searching for screensavers techtv -blogspot.com -wordpress.com -viewtopic -torrent seems to help, but it's still a chore to slog through all the crap. For anyone who wants to try to find more sources, I suggest PC Magazine, PC World, CNET, Wired.com, The New York Times, and Ars Technica. These are the sites that I usually go to when I search for notability for tech-related topics. Maybe someone can find a few hits that I missed. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:22, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted

to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 00:59, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Though off the air 10 years now (making it slightly harder to source), it ran for seven years and was a popular TV series.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 14:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Articles are not kept based on popularity(
  Otterathome (talk) 11:13, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• I agree its not about popularity, but this show is notable[10] (one of many articles that can be found, for editors so inclined), you do not claim it was not in the nomination, I noted.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 13:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I am happy with the sfgate reference. If someone found 1-2 more sources which reviewed the subject of this article then I would !vote keep, but right now, this fails
  WP:GNG. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:09, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Relisted

to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Highlight show on TechTV; notability is not lost over time. Even killing all the segment and fan-cruft, a good stub is still formed from all of this.
  chatter) 02:02, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]