Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Seduction of Misty Mundae
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
The Seduction of Misty Mundae
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Seduction of Misty Mundae (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Sexuality and gender. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:48, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 12:14, 23 July 2022 (UTC)]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It's unclear why the AFD nominator removed a valid PROD tag in order to send it to AFD instead. But it is now no longer eligible for "Soft Deletion".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:57, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - does not meet notability per WP:NFO. Cannot locate reliable secondary sources, and no other relevant inclusion criteria seems apparent. MaxnaCarta (talk) 12:45, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.