Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Suicide King (Album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mgm|^(talk) 12:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Suicide King (Album)

The Suicide King (Album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article is totally unsourced, unfounded and speculative. The follow-up to

Totally agree. It's not even speculation, it's completely made up. Relapse 1 hasn't even come out, there's no way he has a tracklist with timecodes and release dates. How stupid could someone be to try and bullshit true fans. Come on now. Delete this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.40.21.244 (talk) 17:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no information in
  WP:RS. A Google News search returns 0 hits. Tassedethe (talk) 00:04, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:24, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unsourced, hoax? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 00:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I Think the creator of this page has this album mistaken with
  Relapse 2. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soprano90 (talk • contribs) 00:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Unsourced hoax.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 01:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete Even if true (
  completely different upcoming album (I also think its little too early for an article on that one too). Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 01:48, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.