Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Threeep
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge all to
]The Threeep
- The Threeep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not sure what to make of this article about a multi-release project by a notable band. There are actually three different releases, one of which has happened, but the others raise issues with
WP:NALBUMS. For now I recommend Merge/Redirect to Matt Pond PA until after the whole project is complete and it achieves notability in total. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Update: For the same reason, I recommend the same merge/redirect for these associated EP articles:
- )
- )
- DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:18, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:01, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to The Threeep And if there is enough material/sources to justify splitting, then split. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:02, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge all to The Threeep for now, keeping the redirects. When more sources and content can be found, they can be split once more. Airplaneman talk 19:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.