Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tricifixion of Swine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 23:32, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Tricifixion of Swine

The Tricifixion of Swine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no independent notability shown for this limited edition ep. no charting or awards. lacks coverage in independent reliable sources.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 11:16, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Notable labels and reviews as well. You just have to dig a bit to get them. The Undead Never Die (talk) 19:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Being on a notable label is not part of

reliable source, what reviews? duffbeerforme (talk) 07:49, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete Not notable, per
  WP:NALBUMS and duffbeerforme remarks. --DThomsen8 (talk) 02:22, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

It is for a band, but not for an album. See

WP:BAND #5. Dream Focus 14:22, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted

to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• It says it released only 300 copies. Is this correct? I find it highly unlikely an album would be notable if it sold so poorly as to only be released on 300 albums. Do you mean 300 vinyl perhaps, and then also a CD that sold more copies than that? Dream Focus 14:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete has not demonstrably charted or had significant independent coverage in reliable sources, so subject fails
  WP:GNG. Hekerui (talk) 16:39, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.