Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Whole F'n Show
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect. There is a consensus that this does not qualify as a standalone article. Since none of the delete !votes give any reason that this should not be a redirect, there is no reason in the discussion not to have the redirect. Rlendog (talk) 17:27, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Whole F'n Show
An ip turned this article into a redirect without consensus. I don't believe this is correct procedure. So I have reverted the edit to restore the article and wish to open the discussion up to other wikipedia members. If this ends up getting erased so be it but at least procedure would have been followed. By the way my vote is keep Ruth-2013 (talk) 21:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A one off event with relatively sparse coverage in reliable sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 00:20, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to WP:PW, it's not customary to have articles on individual non-PPV events for either of the top two companies. This event barely attracted routine coverage from the wrestling press and possibly none from the mainstream. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 13:38, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MacMedtalkstalk 21:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →TSU tp* 10:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails both WP: EVENT and WP: GNG. I googled it and couldn't find any reliable sources. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 14:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Rob Van Dam as a plausable search-term. Lugnuts (talk) 17:31, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.