Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Young Country Doctor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Young Country Doctor

The Young Country Doctor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page primarily serves to promote self-published books. 'Chilton Designs Publishers' only lists books written by the author on its catalogue, suggesting it is a vanity publishing shell run or owned by the author to add faux credibility.

Sources are especially weak and article creator may have had a COI bias. MrEarlGray (talk) 21:11, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MrEarlGray (talk) 21:11, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:30, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete very few self-published works are notable, nothing suggests this is one of the rare exceptions.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Maintain the page, I created as a reader and for other readers of these books, which are similar to Mrs Caldicot's Cabbage War, a popular film.(talk)

• Huge fan of the series, found the page by checking google - great information, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.228.226.68 (talk) 14:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote either keep or delete and provide rationale for why. MrEarlGray (talk) 17:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• KEEP THE PAGE - OF INTEREST TO FANS/READERS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.228.226.68 (talk) 12:23, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - can't find enough in-depth sourcing from reliable secondary sources to meet
  WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.