Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The eras history of prowrestling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -

The eras history of prowrestling

The eras history of prowrestling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unreferenced, unfocused, factually dubious article on a subject already covered by History of professional wrestling. Alksub 07:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. redundant. Besides, History of professional wrestling does a better job than this article.--Lenticel ^(talk) 10:22, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: a nice idea, but perhaps the author could put his knowledge to use in existing articles? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 11:23, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Redundant & OR. No sources for claims. Spawn Man 12:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete some content could be merged into History of professional wrestling, which, as Lenticel states, is superior to this new creation. The other article could use some additional content concerning the different organizations (there were others besides the AWA prior to the Vince McMahon era). Alternatively, this could be changed from a "history" article to one about the different circuits that have come and gone over the years. Leave history to historians, wrestling articles to wrestling fans. Mandsford 12:23, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, redundant info and original research. Nikki311 14:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. —Nikki311 14:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Very redundant with other "pro wrestling history" pages. Dannycali 02:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note, the author and only substantial editor of this article redirected the page to History of professional wrestling. I undid the edit because this AfD is not yet over. The redirect The uncencored history of prowrestling was also redirected to the History of professional wrestling. I have also fixed it and redirected back to its original article. Nikki311 16:50, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.