Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Barbusca (2nd nomination)

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Barbusca

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Thomas Barbusca (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NACTOR, and poorly sourced content. Frontman830 (talk) 04:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Frontman830 (talk) 04:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Notable actor who was one of the main stars of a TV show, The Mick. RS include [1][2][3]. Natg 19 (talk) 23:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, there are number of unreliable source such as YouTube, which may not be used for notability. --Frontman830 (talk) 01:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: a number of "not very unreliable sources" doesn't mean the subject isn't notable enough.
    WP:GNG states that "there is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected." - 𓋹 𝓩𝓲𝓪𝓭 𝓡𝓪𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓭 𓋹 [user | talk] 15:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Go Phightins! 15:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 11:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thomas_Barbusca_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=1015932405"