Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Chang

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested deletion. Sandstein 07:43, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Chang

Tim Chang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In

WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE, "Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus, may be closed as delete." I also ask participants of the discussion to keep in mind that the article is fairly promotional as is, so doesn't greatly contribute to the encyclopedia, even without considering the above request. Sam-2727 (talk) 01:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sam-2727 (talk) 01:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete clearly not notable enough to justify an article against his request to not have one.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.