Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Rexing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Rexing

Tina Rexing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I find it lacks notability. Is the BLP of a baker entrepreneur that has a coffee shop Alexcalamaro (talk) 18:40, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Alexcalamaro (talk) 18:40, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Alexcalamaro (talk) 18:40, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Alexcalamaro (talk) 18:40, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:45, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I did note on the talk page, pretty much immediately after writing this article, that it might be better to rewrite parts of it and rename it T-Rex Cookie. It was my impression from the sources I found that either Rexing or T-Rex would be notable, and I decided to write the article primarily from a biographical standpoint initially, but would be perfectly happy if the decision was the article doesn't meet the requirements for BLP. Anyway, I have no strong feelings either way on this AfD, but wanted to raise that alternative again. --MarkTraceur (talk) 18:56, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MarkTraceur: yeah, I think it is better to move it to T-Rex Cookie. The way the article is now, seems a little bit promotional to me. Alexcalamaro (talk) 20:56, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Rename and keep per the discussion above. Interesting info worth keeping.--Concertmusic (talk) 22:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. An article on the company could be written from the sources in this article, but this article is truly just a resume. The company is notable, but founders don't inherit notability from their companies. FalconK (talk) 23:03, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• • Comment on second read, I'm not actually so sure the company is notable. Coverage of it appears to be exclusively local. I'm still in camp delete. FalconK (talk) 01:42, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per FalconK's reasoning.--Bettydaisies (talk) 01:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Transitory, and the coverage is almost exclusively local.
  Kablammo (talk) 11:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep and should be renamed per MarkTraceur above. Just a quick glance at the article and a Google search I see enough local coverage as well as NPR, an appearance on Today, and at least one mention on Today's website. ~EdGl talk 20:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The linked sources are respectively an interview and a recipe (which happens to mention her in passing). FalconK (talk) 04:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The person is not notable.
  WP:TNT should be followed and a new article made for the cookie itself, parts and sources could be copied over. ~RAM (talk) 05:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.