Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Blomfield

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:13, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Blomfield

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An directory-like page on an unremarkable entrepreneur. The only notable entity he's associated with is

WP:SPIP and / or not independent of the company. Created by Special:Contributions/Lljammydodger77 who also created the Mondo article. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:16, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:47, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:47, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alas, keep this
Mondo cane. -The Gnome (talk) 09:46, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:43, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:34, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not a place for promotional articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:47, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - plenty of sources available to meet
WP:BIO. This is just one of many. Being "an unremarkable entrepreneur" is not grounds for deletion. The question is whether he meets our notability standards and sources available show he does. The article is not particularly promotional. At present it is a broadly factual stub and the way forward is to add balancing text. Just Chilling (talk) 01:52, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.