Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Armstrong
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:47, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tony Armstrong
- Tony Armstrong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to fail
WP:Athlete as he has not competed at the fully professional level of this sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport. --VS talk 11:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 14:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per VS - WP:Athlete not met and trumps basic notability criteria if that criteria are being applied to that person's sporting career - refs in the paper to sporting achievements need to be subject to the lens of WP:Athlete. --Matilda talk 22:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 00:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:ATHLETE. McWomble (talk) 09:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete AFL wanabee that might not be. The draft gives him a chance of an AFL future, but that's all. His playing career to date in junior ranks is insufficient. Murtoa (talk) 03:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.