Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TorSearch

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Tor (network). Liz Read! Talk! 22:20, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TorSearch

TorSearch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination per consensus at RfD. CycloneYoris talk! 22:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge to Tor(Network). There is a section in that article called "Implementations" and this is not mentioned there. If it can't be used there for some reason (to be decided by people with much more knowledge of Tor) then it isn't significant enough to have its own article. Lamona (talk) 03:10, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • TorSearch is a clearnet/onion service. Definitely not part of onion software implementations.Greatder (talk) 06:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Tor (network): Per Lamona. Barely found anything about the search engine aside from this article. I believe it's best for this search engine to be discussed in the target article. ASTIG️🙃 (ICE-TICE CUBE) 15:30, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.